Basic Energy Particle and Modern Nuclear Physics Incompatibilities:
Protons have been broken into many more than 1000 parts. The last I heard, which was many years ago, scientists had estimated that there are in excess of 4,000 different unique forms of subatomic energies.
A particle is Not a piece of matter, it is a description of an observable or derived energy interaction.
If the smallest unit of concern is the Basic Energy Particle. This is in direct contradiction with scientists who are using supercolliders to break atoms apart, when they say there are uncountable numbers of unique interactions.
http://www.whiterose.org/dr.elmo/blog/archives/007630.html
If an information particle acts inconsistently, then it is composed of other artifacts than what is known.
There must always be something smaller than a Basic Energy Particle;
unless....
perhaps a multi-dimensional energy exhibits an infinite number of different observable properties based upon local dimension environmental conditions. That might help to explain why supercolliders continue to find a vast array of unique packets of energy. The energy packets we observe exist within our dimension. Various properties of those energy packets may exist in other dimensional space. So we get inconsistent results based upon constituent properties that exist in other dimensional spaces.
There would be junctions of anomally that would exist under arbitrarily many diverse conditions. If this is the case, then science is attacking the problem of understanding nuclear physics from the wrong direction; since an arbitrary many different anomallies will occur with no limit to the varying degrees to which coincident strands of diverse multi-dimensional energies intersect.
Think of a fishing net laid out flat in the water. Imagine the following limitations:
- the only thing you can see are the knots that link the fish net strands together
- you can only see a 2D view of the net from 1,000 miles away
- you have no ability to sense the water
- you have no ability to sense the strands connecting the net knots
Now grab the center and pull. The funnel shape pulls the knots of the fishing net closer together and in an arrangement that seems to have a pattern. But without being able to sense the strands that tie the knots together, or see a 3D image, we can only guess at the cause of the shape that forms. Perhaps a gravity-like force is pulling the knots into the shape; we wouldn't know, we could only attempt a guess, and then correlate all that we know to see if it makes sense.
The concept of the Basic Energy Particle appears to fall apart under the testing by supercolliders. However, as an observable consequence of a multidimensional energy it has merit.
Composing a Basic Energy Particle:
Take a Basic Energy Particle and list all the different unique states within it. These states would be the coincidence (observable intersections) of energy fields. You could not define the Basic Energy Particle by these intersections because they would change from moment to moment depending upon the multidimensional environment(perhaps finite or infinitely many dimensions).
We can not use traditional mathematics because traditional mathematics is discrete. Every number has an infinite number of numbers between them. No description could possibly be correct.
So by what mechanism can the Basic Energy Particle be described? What mode of description can describe that which forms the coincidence of infinitly diverse interactions?
Compare this problem with using the English language to describe the word "Love". No matter how many words you use, or in any combination, the description just doesn't fit the loving feeling one possesses. The word "Love" is vastly different and limited as compared to the actual feeling that it describes. So it is with the Basic Energy Particle.
James
